Blog

In an Arkansas mall, two Air Force recruiters, decked out in crisp uniforms, embarked on a rather optimistic mission. They hopped from store to store, their pitch as polished as their shoes, asking bewildered employees if they fancied a career leap into the wild blue yonder. I bumped into them outside the pretzel place, near my booth where I've setup my company for the holiday shopping month.  With my background in selling companies and hosting a podcast, our conversation quickly veered off into a cocktail of unconventional topics.  We chatted about China, and I playfully nudged about World War 3. "Not yet," they chuckled, with a wink that said "or is it?".  Then, diving into the deep end, we talked about aliens, UFOs, and the enigmatic Skinwalker Ranch.  I even threw in my two cents about interviewing a Chinese virologist. […]

 In this insightful conversation, Dr. Harcombe dives deep into a controversial study that claimed a connection between red meat and diabetes. She criticizes the study's methodology, citing the lack of adjustment for grain and sugar intake, and the misleading classification of red meat. Harcombe also discusses what she sees as inherent bias in academia and research institutions, which can lead to skewed findings fueled by industrial influence. Ultimately, she encourages listeners to favor simpler, heritage foods over processed options, and to be critical of media headlines regarding nutrition.00:00 Introduction00:00 Understanding the Nutritional Headlines00:24 The Hidden Agendas in Academia01:17 The Global Push Away from Ancestral Foods03:49 The Influence of Big Food and Pharma on Research05:37 The Deterioration of Academic Research06:25 Questioning the Nutritional Training of Researchers07:03 Understanding the Hierarchy of Evidence00:01 The Flaws in Population Studies12:06 The Malicious Intent Behind the […]